Teh bibl

He didnt, the road crossed him.

In communist Russia, street cross you!

Alright, this is turning into a blathering toipic, so I need to curb this.

*ahem*

While I really don't care what people believe, the bibleis full of contradictions.

But hey, how else do you cover your ass nowadays?

....some of what the bible says is completely unorthoodox. its funny. like, how the hell are Eve's kids supposed to continue the generation without boinking themselves? Then considering they were all boys, they'd have to boink their mom!

I mean, incest is wrong....oh no...even though God obviously wants to see some major son on mom action....*hangs head in shame* the bible is soooo fucked up.

Lord_Gneo wrote:

In communist Russia, street cross you!

Alright, this is turning into a blathering toipic, so I need to curb this.

*ahem*

While I really don't care what people believe, the bibleis full of contradictions.

But hey, how else do you cover your ass nowadays?

Well...I blame the Jews most of the time. J/k Just in case no one could tell. I don't need any more protests outside my house.

.....there have been protests outside your house?

Not yet I haven't. But soon...

i didnt bother. it doesnt concern me, and i dont plan on asking for redemption.

Ying Fa wrote:

....some of what the bible says is completely unorthoodox. its funny. like, how the hell are Eve's kids supposed to continue the generation without boinking themselves? Then considering they were all boys, they'd have to boink their mom!

I mean, incest is wrong....oh no...even though God obviously wants to see some major son on mom action....*hangs head in shame* the bible is soooo fucked up.

I seem to remember a conversation between you and Heather about incest. I do believe you guys agreed upon your "only certain people" approach that I see you two use somewhat often. It was about the Elricks I think. I think it was when you wanted her to draw you FMA porn, but she drew them without penis's, which was funny because it's a Japanese cartoon, so that may have been accurate.

Haha.

Well, like .....some incest in TV i like, but if i think about it and compare, well, i am not attracted to my sister about that.

I have to set the boundaries for myself as well. Its not so much about sibling sex, its about pairing two people that are perfect for each other. Thats what Al and Ed are. Perfect for each other, in every sense, and i would still like the pairing if they werent related.

Plus, penises are ugly, so why would we WANT to look at them?

Ying Fa wrote:

Plus, penises are ugly, so why would we WANT to look at them?

Penises are ugly? Vagina's are easily much more hideous. Have you ever seen a woman who has had children? Not pretty. After being stretched that much, everything doesn't fit back in. *shudders at the mental image* Gross.

I think the point is new genitalia > used genitalia.

Any who, I sudied the book of genisis and it is foolishness. It makes several references to giants and says people lived hundreds of years, but began living much younger lives. That contradicts what fossil records say and I will take solid evidence over ancient myth.

...Yes.

Anyways, i wasnt saying that vaginas are the prettiest things on earth, i was just saying that penises are grosser, prolly because i dont have one.

Anyways, so its says that people who are old live life young? I'm confused.


And obviously, i'm a realist. I really cant believe anything unless i see it first.

I'm very skeptical. ^^

Oh. There was a typo. I meant to write lived, but the d ran away. And it is a good thing to be skeptical. Stay that way.

Yes sir.

Yeah, typos suck, but the wonderful button labeled "edit this post" comes in very handy.

Ying Fa wrote:

Yes sir.

Yeah, typos suck, but the wonderful button labeled "edit this post" comes in very handy.

actually, its edit/delete this post

but anywho.
ahteist's have their points that they rely on. and say that there is no such thing. but there really isnt no definite truth to either existance or non-existance of a god or gods. so. I think atheists are the people who try to reason things out, but only reason enough about their own side, they are far to biased and need to re-think or atleast aknowledge the fact that they might be wrong.(im not scorning anyone by the way, just generalizing)
so. yep. thought I'd say that.( I like voicing my opinions... im human I can't help it)

P.S. Agnostic > Atheist. = better resoning.

Naw. I just dont see how people can set their whole lives on a God that may or may not be there to hear them. It doesnt make common sense to me for them to pray and pray, and never get an answer, or if they do, they think its an act of God when its just a natural phenomenon. It seems like pointless living to me. I'm not going to pray to god to make my life, I'm gonna go out there and do it for myself, because I know that if i dont, no one else will.

You should work on punctuation, Cody. Anyways, I'm am firm in my belief that all things have an explanation. Should there be a life form that exists that is capable of making life (we will be soon), it wouldn't be a god, it would still be a living thing capable of being destroyed. Agnostics don't know what they believe. They have no firm stance on anything. Agnosticism is weak. Agnostics are weak. I have tried reasoning out the Christian side (since I was raised Lutheran, went to Sunday school, went through confirmation, and still get dragged to church every Sunday), but there was no logic. I refuse to believe a giant invisible man used his magic to create the universe. If you consider that to be possible, go right ahead, but stay in school. You need it.

(I know you said Cody, but I'm commenting too) I'm used to my spell-check catching these things. At least they're not typos. I dont go back to cap ever I or every beginning. I dont really care that much about punctuation here. However when every other word is either omitted or spelled wrong, then I get pissed! (ie, Duckie)

I completely agree with you, Moogle. Its just....ludicrous. (I dont know if i spelled that right^^) But...i dont even really know how to describe it, its completely dumb. Idiotic and very very close-minded and naive of anybody to believe in this. Oi. It kinda makes me want to smack them in the head very hard. (Albert)

Gothic Teddy wrote:

Ying Fa wrote:

Yes sir.

Yeah, typos suck, but the wonderful button labeled "edit this post" comes in very handy.

actually, Its edit/delete this post.


But any who, atheist's have their points that they rely on and say that there is no such thing, but there really is no definite truth to either existence or non-existence of a god or gods. So I think atheists are the people who try to reason things out, but only reason enough about their own side, they are far to biased and need to re-think or at least acknowledge the fact that they might be wrong.(I'm not scorning anyone by the way, just generalizing)
So, yep. thought I'd say that.( I like voicing my opinions... I'm human I can't help it)

P.S. Agnostic > Atheist. = better reasoning.

Do you have any evidece for that claim?

At the risk of sounding like i have no opinion of my own, i have agree with Moogle again, though at the rate Cody even goes on this forum, i doubt we'll hear from him any time soon.

Yeah. I also took the liberty of editing his post. It's perdy now.

Hehe. I think it kinda sucks you can edit anyone's post. Its like plagerism. (kinda)

But, whatev. If he wants to suck at grammar and spelling, that's his loss.